DonF Posted May 28, 2017 Report Share Posted May 28, 2017 the most common terrorist in the US is white and racist and claim to be patriots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcbuff Posted May 29, 2017 Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 He is a terrorist of a different color. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 lmao so predictable Raise your hand if you knew RC was going to post an example of either a black man or a middle easterner Waves hand and next up is Don with page long denial post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 http://resistancereport.com/news/white-terrorists-killed-more-this-week/ http://www.newsweek.com/2016/02/12/right-wing-extremists-militants-bigger-threat-america-isis-jihadists-422743.html Right-Wing Extremists Are a Bigger Threat to America Than ISIS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcbuff Posted May 29, 2017 Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 Raise your hand if you knew DonF's source would be Occupy Democrats, or Mother Jones, focusing on whites while overlooking the most murderous racial demographic in the US? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2017 try again RC the worst domestic terorist attack in the US sure as hell wasnt a black guy 160 men women and children murdered by a white right wing radical In OKC Yes so predictable you cant find terrorist acts so you attempt to impose crime stats while ignoring facts http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kerry-coddett/white-on-white-crime-an-u_b_6771878.html I realize you have sucked in all of Rumps lies especially those he has been proven to have lied about but heres a few more of those pesky facts you like to ignore like that the number of Blacks killed by white is going up https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 10 hours ago, DonF said: try again RC the worst domestic terorist attack in the US sure as hell wasnt a black guy 160 men women and children murdered by a white right wing radical In OKC Yes so predictable you cant find terrorist acts so you attempt to impose crime stats while ignoring facts http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kerry-coddett/white-on-white-crime-an-u_b_6771878.html I realize you have sucked in all of Rumps lies especially those he has been proven to have lied about but heres a few more of those pesky facts you like to ignore like that the number of Blacks killed by white is going up https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers I was under the impression that the "worst domestic terorist {sic} attack in the US" was the September 11, 2001 attacks that killed more than 3,000 people... But don't let me stop you from quoting your "facts". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcbuff Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 Oh, so the tread topic is already changing...again...from "Terrorism in America" with an example of a double murder which I countered with the murderer of 8 people and now it jumps again to "Domestic Terrorism"... ADD much? https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014/tables/expanded-homicide-data/expanded_homicide_data_table_3_murder_offenders_by_age_sex_and_race_2014.xls By the way, your HUffington compost article neglects to mention the percentage of whites v blacks. (a slight of hand trick that many don't catch) Just so you know, Whites make 62.3% of the US population and blacks make up roughly 13%. That actually proves my point. Now, look at the chart above, notice that 13% of the population committed 806 more murders than the largest demographic 63% ... white by the way. I'll put up a link to interactive graphic that uses 2010 FBI And Census Bureau stats. to show you how that looks from multiple perspectives.The most staggering depiction in the graphic is what happens if the percentage of population were reversed.(note this is for all crimes) https://infogr.am/Black-34991937313 By the way, one of your articles, the Newsweek article decided to skip the elephant in the room by cherry picking 2002 as it's beginning point. What a crock of shit article. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcbuff Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 OH, something else, your US News, article refers to "killings" not "murders", there is a difference you know. The number of black"killings" may have gone up due to an increase in self defense measures by whites. One more thing: Whites are to become a minority in a few years, now, look back at those stats in the graphics again, with that in mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 9/11 wasnt committed by a us citizen OKC was nice attempt to confuse and deflect though do·mes·tic ter·ror·ism noun North American noun: domestic terrorism the committing of terrorist acts in the perpetrator's own country against their fellow citizens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcbuff Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 3 hours ago, DonF said: 9/11 wasnt committed by a us citizen OKC was nice attempt to confuse and deflect though do·mes·tic ter·ror·ism noun North American noun: domestic terrorism the committing of terrorist acts in the perpetrator's own country against their fellow citizens. Please read the title of your thread carefully, it is two words long . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 5 hours ago, DonF said: 9/11 wasnt committed by a us citizen OKC was nice attempt to confuse and deflect though do·mes·tic ter·ror·ism noun North American noun: domestic terrorism the committing of terrorist acts in the perpetrator's own country against their fellow citizens. I'm not really sure what your source is since you didn't seem inclined to mention it, but according the the U.S. Criminal Code: U.S. Code ›Title 18›Part I›Chapter 113B› § 2331 Current through Pub. L.114-38. (SeePublic Laws for the current Congress.) (5)the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B)appear to be intended— (i)to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii)to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii)to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C)occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. (AddedPub. L. 102–572, title X, § 1003(a)(3), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4521; amended Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, § 802(a), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 376.) Now everyone can decide for themselves whether to believe your anonymous - unnamed- source defining "domestic terrorism" - Or whether to go with the established United States Criminal Code definition regarding "domestic terrorism". I'll take my choice from the official established version from the U.S. Government criminal code, instead from some source from who-knows-where which appears to have been redefined to fit a particular narrative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 Its called the dictionary Don Though I give you credit for the further attempt at diversion and defection Quite frankly I'll stick with the dictionary definition as its been around longer and unlike the government its definition doesnt change depending on which party is in office. funny how the government likes to try to change the definition when ever it suits them , kinda like weapons of mass destruction . whats Ironic is that the republican house and senate qualify as terrorists according to the definition you posted part 1 and part 2 they are after all guilty of attempting to assassinate thousands of US citizens with their budget and healthcare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcbuff Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 2 hours ago, DonF said: Its called the dictionary Don Though I give you credit for the further attempt at diversion and defection Quite frankly I'll stick with the dictionary definition as its been around longer and unlike the government its definition doesnt change depending on which party is in office. funny how the government likes to try to change the definition when ever it suits them , kinda like weapons of mass destruction . whats Ironic is that the republican house and senate qualify as terrorists according to the definition you posted part 1 and part 2 they are after all guilty of attempting to assassinate thousands of US citizens with their budget and healthcare Seeing as how there are literally thousands of dictionaries out there including a couple of dictionaries like the Urban Dictionary were people get to make up their own definitions to fit commonly used terms... I don't think there is any such thing as "The" dictionary anymore. As for dictionary definitions in dictionaries being around and unchanged for so long - obviously you forgot about the recent revision to the term "marriage" in most dictionaries to fit the populist, PC narrative. Like I said there is the widely distributed definition, then there is the official and legally accepted criminal definition of domestic terrorism which is probably why Jeremy Christian, the stabbing suspect has been charged with murder and attempted murder instead of any terrorism charges despite your attempting to claim one thing is actually something else entirely. Instead of trying to go over the top with your accusations of 'terrorism', perhaps you should have tried to stick with the facts or at least something a little closer to the facts like say a possible hate crime charge (which according to the latest news he has not been charged with) *but exaggeration and hyperbole seems to be the progressive norm when attempting to make accusations against the people they oppose or disagree with. * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 Damn you and Rumpy get real testy when you make false statements you can look it up in websters and britanica if you like , sorry I dont have a copy of the GOP alternative facts dictionary nor the rightwing revised redefinition dictionary you obviously prefer. Consider Tim M is credited for the worst act of domestic terrorism in the US. Key word there is Domestic meaning Home , country of origin , examples being domestic product , made in the USA, as you well know but instead chose to create a strawman because you couldnt argue the fact https://www.aclu.org/other/how-usa-patriot-act-redefines-domestic-terrorism http://study.com/academy/lesson/domestic-terrorism-definition-history-types-examples.html Definition Domestic terrorism commonly involves acts of violence or intimidation by citizens or permanent residents of a nation against the general public or property within that nation with the intention of instilling fear in order to further political, social, or ideological objectives. This lesson takes you through the history of domestic terrorism and the different types of domestic terrorism in the United States, in addition to discussing some examples of this tragic phenomenon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 However since you chose to build that straw man its only fitting I set a match to it http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/tracing-roots-americas-biggest-domestic-terror-attack/ 9/11 was an international terrorist attack http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/report/2002/patterns-of-global-terrorism2001-01.pdf http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report_Exec.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Posted May 30, 2017 Report Share Posted May 30, 2017 43 minutes ago, DonF said: Damn you and Rumpy get real testy when you make false statements you can look it up in websters and britanica if you like , sorry I dont have a copy of the GOP alternative facts dictionary nor the rightwing revised redefinition dictionary you obviously prefer. Consider Tim M is credited for the worst act of domestic terrorism in the US. Key word there is Domestic meaning Home , country of origin , examples being domestic product , made in the USA, as you well know but instead chose to create a strawman because you couldnt argue the fact https://www.aclu.org/other/how-usa-patriot-act-redefines-domestic-terrorism http://study.com/academy/lesson/domestic-terrorism-definition-history-types-examples.html Definition Domestic terrorism commonly involves acts of violence or intimidation by citizens or permanent residents of a nation against the general public or property within that nation with the intention of instilling fear in order to further political, social, or ideological objectives. This lesson takes you through the history of domestic terrorism and the different types of domestic terrorism in the United States, in addition to discussing some examples of this tragic phenomenon. Here we have a classic example of how the ACLU says the patriot act redefines domestic terrorism -vs- what the government definition of domestic terrorism actually is and some website called 'study dot com' - a website where it seems teachers get to offer their opinion on what various words and phrases mean - a perfect example those dictionaries I mentioned where people make the definition fit the narrative, instead of trying to make the narrative fit the established definition... **Do you actually check any of your sources before referencing or posting information from them? For britannica.com, when searching for the term domestic terrorism they offer a forwarding links to *freedictionarydefinitions.com and Amazon.com for a book with the title: The New Terrorism: - How to Fight It and Defeat It - amazon.com. Over 300 pages of 'related' links, including articles on the Patriot Act, without a single specific mention of "domestic terrorism"... As for "websters" or merriam-webster.com when doing a search for "domestic terrorism", the response is Quote Words fail us Sorry, the word you’re looking for can’t be found in the dictionary. There are several possible reasons why the search failed... 21 minutes ago, DonF said: However since you chose to build that straw man its only fitting I set a match to it http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/tracing-roots-americas-biggest-domestic-terror-attack/ 9/11 was an international terrorist attack http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/report/2002/patterns-of-global-terrorism2001-01.pdf http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report_Exec.htm Again publications other than the U.S. government (PBS and global security) to define something a little bit differently than the U.S. government has already defined that term or in the case of PBS - speaking in journalistic generalities. As for the 9/11 commission report, I've read it, what point exactly are you trying to make here? That as the report mentions the word "domestic" numerous times and in each instance, that refers to: "territorial jurisdiction within the United States", the same as the government references I've already posted - not some home grown extremism faction. Sorry ~ I believe I've sufficiently made my point. Sometimes reputed "facts" aren't facts at all they are merely the strong opinion of people or publications who choose to represent their statements as 'fact' - but when you actually look into those claims they aren't as factual as someone claims they are. There are sometimes several given definitions for the same or similar term of course there us usually the official and legally accepted definition then there are the popular/lay or not quite accurate for official or legal determination purposes definitions. You're shouting into the wind my friend you can claim merriam-webster or britannica.com or the 9/11 report says something - but they don't... You can offer articles from various journalistic publications to refute something from the U.S. Government Code statutes but again that is up to the individual which source they give the most credibility... But as you mentioned according to actual "facts" - not misrepresentations improperly represented as "facts" the truth is clearly evident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2017 (edited) your strawman is burned Donnie boy I realize it was just a diversionary tactic to avoid the real issue of radical right wing terrorists Actually they do and since you insist on making the false claims that they dont simply to try to convince those less educated that you are correct, You leave me no choice but to slap you in the face with your lie , which we both know it to be http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/domestic terrorism Noun1.domestic terrorism - terrorism practiced in your own country against your own people; "the 1995 bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City was an instance of domestic terrorism" why looky there my example is the exact same example used and the Oxford dictionary why what do you know again the same definition I gave earlier that you claimed was false and wrong , again your lie is debunked https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/domestic_terrorist domestic terrorist noun North American A person who commits terrorist acts in their own country against their fellow citizens. ‘armed domestic terrorists gained entry into the facility’ domestic terrorist noun North American A person who commits terrorist acts in their own country against their fellow citizens. ‘armed domestic terrorists gained entry into the facility’ domestic terrorist noun North American A person who commits terrorist acts in their own country against their fellow citizens. ‘armed domestic terrorists gained entry into the facility’ http://www.memidex.com/domestic-terrorism and a quote of one of your lies which the above links prove false Quote You're shouting into the wind my friend you can claim merriam-webster or britannica.com or the 9/11 report says something - but they don't... Oh yes They Do maybe you should take those classes considering you obviously dont under stand the difference between a verb and a noun , your definition posted above is that of a verb an action word for those who failed grade school english where as mine is for a Noun simply put a person ,in this case Tim M,place, or thing , though as is shown above you failed on both the verb and the Nouns definition Edited May 31, 2017 by DonF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2017 Hell maybe you're a Trump university gradooate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted May 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2017 I have generally let you go on and on with your false claims and statements but enough is enough writing a 500 word post doesnt make it true , it seems obvious that you dont know how to use a search engine or maybe you do and did so in a manner to purposely mislead considering the links I provided to the above dictionary definitions all appeared on the first page of the searches Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Posted June 2, 2017 Report Share Posted June 2, 2017 On 5/31/2017 at 8:35 AM, DonF said: I have generally let you go on and on with your false claims and statements but enough is enough writing a 500 word post doesnt make it true , it seems obvious that you dont know how to use a search engine or maybe you do and did so in a manner to purposely mislead considering the links I provided to the above dictionary definitions all appeared on the first page of the searches First of all sorry for taking so long to get back to you after your last personal slam directed at me, I had to get a couple of stitches but better now. With the latest update, still no news about Jeremy Christian the man who went on an anti-Muslim rant and stabbed three people in Oregon being charged with any terrorism related charges, still just murder and attempted murder; On Tuesday afternoon, Jeremy Joseph Christian, 35, was arraigned on charges of aggravated murder and attempted murder. He is accused of killing Ricky John Best, 53, of Happy Valley, and Taliesin Myrddin Namkai-Meche, 23, of Southeast Portland. http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/05/who_is_jeremy_christian_facebo.html But then I've already offered my opinion that progressives and anti-Trump reactionaries like yourself seem to often try to use "exaggeration and hyperbole against the people you oppose or disagree with". We have a difference of opinion as to the definition of "domestic terrorism" which as far as I'm concerned is defined by the U.S. Government as a terrorist act committed within the territorial confines of the United States - not surprisingly you disagree apparently preferring to disregard the Government's Criminal Code definition of "domestic terrorism" in favor of journalistic hype and multiple questionable sources. You mentioned Encyclopedia Britannica as one of your sources for the definition for "domestic terrorism" and as I pointed out that word isn't there. You also mentioned "Webster's" and as I pointed out, the usual and most trusted go to source for dictionary definitions has always been the Merriam-Webster dictionary since the two different sources Merriam dictionary and Webster's Dictionary combined in 1843 after Noah Webster died but "domestic terrorism" is absent from Merriam-Webster's dictionary as well. The Merriam company bought the rights to Webster's An American Dictionary of the English Language from Webster's estate Unfortunately the Merriam Company did not obtain the rights to the Webster dictionary name and "anyone can call their dictionary - or website "Webster's" and there is nothing the actual owner's of the Webster's American Dictionary rights can do about it." Which seems to be the case with your Websters-dictionaryOnline.org What you've apparently got is a website name Websters-dictionary that has absolutely no connection with Webster's American Dictionary of the English Language... I guess they just used the name Webster's for the gullible people, who don't seem to be too particular about how accurate the information they attempt to use. Chicago Tribune: Webster more than a dictionary-maker After Webster's death, Springfield, Mass., publishers George and Charles Merriam purchased the rights to Noah Webster's dictionaries, but not to his name. "The name has always been a problem," Morse said. "Merriam-Webster publishes the works that are based on Noah Webster, but does not have exclusive rights to the name `Webster.' Anybody can write a dictionary and call it `Webster,' and there's nothing we can really do about it." http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2006-12-06/features/0612050291_1_first-dictionary-noah-webster-compendious-dictionary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webster's_Dictionary#The_name_Webster_used_by_others For instance look at the footnote and copy-write information at the bottom of the 'Webster's.org' website you referenced, the actual company is not "Webster's", that's just the name of a website produced by the company "Online Dictionary", or take a look at the "About Us" section of the Merriam-Webster dictionary website: Merriam-Webster: Does Merriam-Webster have any connection to Noah Webster? Merriam-Webster can be considered the direct lexicographical heir of Noah Webster. In 1843, the company bought the rights to the 1841 edition of Webster's magnum opus, An American Dictionary of the English Language, Corrected and Enlarged. At the same time, they secured the rights to create revised editions of the work. Since that time, Merriam-Webster editors have carried forward Noah Webster's work, creating some of the most widely used and respected dictionaries and reference books in the world. For more information, see Noah Webster and America's First Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/about-us/faq So what is webster-dictionary.org? It is a website from some group called "Online Dictionary" first published online in 1999 and owned by Philip M. Parker, probably all very legal for Parker to use the "Webster's" name - but intentionally deceptive as Parker has apparently intentionally co-opted the name famous name "Webster" for recognition purposes for his online dictionary and gets his definitions from a hodge-podge of sources including Wiktionary which as I previously mentioned is like Wikipedia where information contributed by all kinds of people - not necessary scholars or even people who would recognize actual facts -vs- opinion presented as fact if it was staring them right in the face. The website "Online Dictionary" was first published online in 1999 and is the product of Philip M. Parker - Wikipedia: Philip M. Parker Online dictionary Parker is also involved—as entrepreneur publisher and editor—in new media reference work projects. He is the instigator of Webster's Online Dictionary: The Rosetta Edition, a multilingual online dictionary created in 1999 and using the "Webster's" name, now in the public domain. This site compiles different online dictionaries and encyclopedia including the Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913), the Wiktionary, and Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_M._Parker#Online_dictionary So go to the "Webster's Online Dictionary: The Rosetta Edition" and type in the term "Domestic Terrorism" and you'll see the results are pretty much as I described before: 404 - File or directory not found. The resource you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. But if you go to the About the Project portion of the website, the author {presumably Parker} does explain why he used the name "Webster's Online Dictionary"... not because of any actual connection to the dictionary publisher Noah Webster - apparently, according to Parker originally wanted to dedicate his dictionary website to "honor Samuel Johnson" but changed his mind and decided to call the website Websters because the term had taken on the slang attribute and had a synonymous association with the words "dictionary" and "American language" and "We also call it Webster's in his honor as an editorial pioneer." That's straight from Parker's - Webster's Online Dictionary's "About" webpage, check it out for yourself. http://faculty.insead.edu/parker/dictionarybrowse/about.html Like I already suggested, you really should at least try to check out some of the sources you want to use - before posting something from them that is so easily refuted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonF Posted June 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2017 Theres the 500 word denial excuse , still attempting to defend the lie rather than admit it . it wasnt the stitches that took days it was the search for a cherry picked source , you do this crap every time you are called on a lie you are still attempting to divert because you screwed up Yes we all know when a white Christian kills numerous people, they are called a lone wolf because heaven forbid we admit that a christian can be a terrorist.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Posted June 2, 2017 Report Share Posted June 2, 2017 If you've been trying to stalk me to determine when I'm getting medical treatment and when I'm not, you are an abject failure and perhaps should consider some other hobby. I would invite you to come over and inspect my wound and the bloody bandages but given you repeated attempts at denial that probably wouldn't convince you either. No, I don't always attempt to immediately reply to some of your posts because there are times I have other things going on in my life and responding to your diatribes are of pretty low priority for me... now back to the topic. I've spent most of this time simply trying to discuss what actually constitutes "domestic terrorism" - not to be transposed with "domestic terrorist" - according to the people who charge and prosecute such crimes -vs- the usual journalistic or progressive hyperbole and exaggeration used by some in order to try to make a case against not one perpetrator but an entire group or class of people, most of whom haven't done anything to earn that animus. Secondly I've pointed out that despite the opinionated hyperbole from the occupydemocrats graphic, the Oregon attacker has been charged with murder and attempted murder - not terrorism - even though you appear intent to try to erroneously make a case for the suspect being a terrorist. You didn't try to make a case for terrorism against some people previously who commited acts of violence and intimidation against their victims - as I said you only try that tactic against the people you oppose ideologically And how is the bigotry espoused by occupy democrats against all white supremacists, some of whom have done nothing but subscribe to that ideology any different than the bigotry of white supremacist against people who have a different ideology or race than themselves? Bigotry is bigotry and you're using bigotry from occupydemocrats to try to protest the bigotry of white supremacists - but then apparently you either don't recognize or are fine with that and there have been many cases in point; the four people in NY who kidnapped, tortured and threatened a mentally disabled boy, the people who beat and stole the car of a man they accused of being a Trump supporter, the Berkeley protesters who used intimidation, threats, violence and destruction to 'protest' another group's right to free speech... You didn't identify any of those people or groups as "domestic terrorist" probably because you tend to agree and support their ideology, if not entirely their methods - but one person with an ideology you don't support commits an act of violence and you try to condemn the entire group of being a "terrorist" even the ones who haven't done anything. Aren't you the one who keeps trying to tell other people it is wrong to try to condemn an entire group of Muslims for the acts of a select few but when it is one accused white supremacist, you immediately jump to the conclusion that all members of that group are terrorists. Double standards much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.